Spectranetics income drops considerably despite 7% revenue increase

Spectranetics experienced severe net losses for its fiscal third quarter, which ended Sept. 30.

The company suffered a net loss of $2.49 million in the 2009 third quarter, compared with a recorded $183,000 in net income for the third quarter of 2008. The losses during the third quarter of 2009 include $3.1 million of special items, consisting of $602,000 of costs associated with a federal investigation; $1 million of costs associated with ongoing litigation (unrelated to the federal investigation); $1 million relating to the discontinuation of the marketing and sales of the Safe-Cross product line; and $366,000 of employee termination and lease abandonment costs.

Compared to $422,000 in the third quarter of last year, the Colorado Springs, Colo.-based Spectranetics reported that its federal investigation costs were $602,000 in this year’s comparable quarter.

According to the company, revenue for the third quarter of 2009 was $28.8 million, up 7 percent compared with revenue of $26.8 million in the previous-year comparable quarter.

Specifically, Spectranetics said that its vascular intervention revenue rose 7 percent to $15.4 million, lead management revenue increased 29 percent to $9.8 million, laser equipment revenue declined 43 percent to $1.4 million, and service and other revenue declined 6 percent to $2.2 million, all compared with the third quarter of 2008. Vascular intervention sales include three product lines–atherectomy, which decreased 3 percent, crossing solutions, which increased 23 percent, and thrombectomy, which increased 26 percent, all compared with the 2008 third quarter.

Around the web

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Kate Hanneman, MD, explains why many vendors and hospitals want to lower radiology's impact on the environment. "Taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in healthcare isn’t just an opportunity," she said. "It’s also a responsibility."