JAMA: Higher volume PCI hospitals do not reduce hospital length of stay

Even though hospitals that perform a higher number of angioplasties are more likely to follow evidence-based guidelines and have shorter times to the angioplasty procedure, there appears to be no significant difference in outcomes such as length of hospital stay or risk of death, according to registry findings published in the Nov. 25 issue of Journal of the American Medical Association.

Several studies have shown an inverse relationship between hospital primary angioplasty volume and the risk of death in patients with STEMI. Based on the results of various studies, current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines recommend that primary angioplasty in patients with STEMI be conducted by cardiac cath labs performing at least 36 primary angioplasties a year, as well as at least 200 total angioplasties a year, according to the authors.

“The majority of these studies were conducted before the regular use of stents and the routine use of newer adjunctive pharmacotherapy, such as dual-antiplatelet therapy and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, both of which have been associated with better outcomes in these patients. However, more contemporary data supporting a relationship between hospital primary angioplasty volume and outcomes are not available,” wrote Dharam J. Kumbhani, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic, and colleagues.

The researchers examined the relationship between hospital primary angioplasty volume and patient outcomes and quality-of-care measures for 29,513 patients presenting with STEMI at 166 angioplasty-capable hospitals across the U.S. Patients received angioplasty between July 2001 and December 2007.

They divided hospitals into groups based on their annual primary angioplasty volume (less than 36 procedures per year, 36-70 procedures per year and greater than 70 procedures per year). The authors included various measures in the analysis, including door-to-balloon times, length of hospital stay, adherence with evidence-based quality of care measures and in-hospital mortality.

Compared with low- and medium-volume centers, Kumbhani and colleagues found that median door-to-balloon times were the lowest in high-volume centers (98 vs. 90 vs. 88 minutes, respectively). The proportion of patients meeting ACC/AHA guidelines of DTB time of 90 minutes or less was highest in the high-volume centers. Compared with high-volume hospitals, they found that patients presenting to low-volume hospitals but not medium-volume hospitals were less likely to achieve a door-to-balloon time of 90 minutes or less.

Average (4.6 vs. 4.5 vs. 4.7 days) and median (three days each) lengths of stay were similar between low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals, respectively, according to the authors. High-volume centers were more likely than low-volume centers to follow evidence-based guidelines at discharge.

The researchers found that overall in-hospital mortality was 3.2 percent (incidence rate 3.9 vs. 3.2 vs. 3 percent for low-, medium-, and high-volume centers, respectively), with analysis indicating no statistically significant difference between the three groups and the adjusted mortality.

“Our results, especially with respect to in-hospital mortality, are contrary to other published registry studies in patients with STEMI,” the authors concluded. “One of the main differences is that our study reflects more contemporary practice. Angioplasty techniques and adjunctive pharmacotherapy have seen substantial improvements over the past few years, and there has been a significant standardization of these practices nationwide. In addition, evidence-based therapies are much more widely adopted and practiced.”

Kumbhani and colleagues added that one of the reasons their findings are important is that procedural volume is increasingly being used as a surrogate for quality of care. “Some organizations have set standards for urban hospitals to meet before they would contract the care of their employees with them. These include minimum volumes for several procedures including angioplasty. Our study makes a case against such volume criteria,” they wrote.

Around the web

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Kate Hanneman, MD, explains why many vendors and hospitals want to lower radiology's impact on the environment. "Taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in healthcare isn’t just an opportunity," she said. "It’s also a responsibility."