Pay for performance, or pass it up?

| | Cardiovascular Business | Economics

Most people agree reimbursement that rewards volume has fueled overuse and high costs for U.S. healthcare. But few agree on the best replacement. François de Brantes, executive director of the Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute, made a case for pay-for-performance incentives recently in the Wall Street Journal. Steffie Woolhandler, MD, MPH, of the City University of New York School of Public Health, shared why she thinks it is a bad idea.

Should physician pay be tied to performance?

Related Content

Q&A: MedAxiom CEO explores key trends in cardiologist, cardiovascular surgeon compensation
Positron partners with Upbeat Cardiology Solutions to improve cardiac PET/CT access
Abbott opens CGM sensor manufacturing facility in Ireland as part of $465M investment
Eko Health’s AI platform for digital stethoscopes granted new CPT code
Cardiologist demand is on the rise—can hospitals keep up?
Cardiologist receives 35 months in prison for health insurance fraud

Around the web

Health Imaging
Use of AI opportunistic screening in CT for cardiovascular disease

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Health Imaging
New imaging protocols proposed to curb rise of cardiovascular infections

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Radiology Business
What does radiology have to do with climate change?

Kate Hanneman, MD, explains why many vendors and hospitals want to lower radiology's impact on the environment. "Taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in healthcare isn’t just an opportunity," she said. "It’s also a responsibility."