Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin for AFib patients: What the latest research tells us

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AFib) who are treated with non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are less likely to develop diabetes than those treated with warfarin, according to an in-depth analysis out of Taiwan.

The study, published in full in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, included data from more than 10,000 adult patients with newly detected AFib. All patients received care from 2012 to 2016, and data was taken from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. The mean follow-up period was 2.4 years.

Overall, the authors found that patients treated with a NOAC were 20% less likely to go on to develop diabetes than patients treated with warfarin. The difference was even more pronounced when the patient was over the age of 65.

“NOACs should be considered the preferable anticoagulant treatment due to the lower risks of diabetes, especially for elderly patients,” Huei-Kai Huang, MD, of Hualien Tzu Chi Medical Center in Taiwan, said in a statement. “Modifications to treatment practices based on these insights could help improve the long-term prognoses of atrial fibrillation patients for whom oral anticoagulant treatment is needed.”

The research team was unable to separately confirm each diagnosis, they noted. Another potential limitation was one NOAC, edoxaban, could not be included in the analysis due to a limited availability.

Click here for the full study.

Michael Walter
Michael Walter, Managing Editor

Michael has more than 18 years of experience as a professional writer and editor. He has written at length about cardiology, radiology, artificial intelligence and other key healthcare topics.

Around the web

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Kate Hanneman, MD, explains why many vendors and hospitals want to lower radiology's impact on the environment. "Taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in healthcare isn’t just an opportunity," she said. "It’s also a responsibility."