CKD patient slapped with $540K dialysis bill

A 50-year-old personal trainer and his wife, a physician in Plains, Mont., are struggling to afford a hospital bill totaling more than half a million dollars after insurance failed to help cover the man’s critical 14-week dialysis treatment, NBC News reports.

Sovereign Valentine was admitted to a local Montana hospital for CKD after weeks of feeling run-down and repeat episodes of vomiting, NBC reported July 25. When he was told he was in kidney failure and would need outpatient dialysis three times a week, Valentine and his wife, Jessica, opted for care at a Fresenius Kidney Care clinic in Missoula.

Fresenius was out-of-network for the Valentines, but Jessica was told by an insurance case manager there were no in-network dialysis clinics in Montana, limiting their options. In the end, Valentine’s insurer paid $16,241.72 for 14 weeks of treatment; he and his wife were hit with the remaining $540,814.90.

According to NBC, Fresenius is one of two companies—the other being rival DaVita—that control around 70% of the U.S. dialysis market. Together the companies form a “duopoly,” meaning they can charge extraordinarily high prices for their live-saving treatments. 

Medicare is a far more affordable option for dialysis, paying on average $235 per session (Fresenius billed the Valentines $13,867.74 per session). But end-stage renal disease patients like Valentine, who are under 65 years old, can only join Medicare after a 90-day waiting period. 

“To me, it’s so outrageous that I just have to laugh,” Valentine told NBC.

Read the full story below:

""

After graduating from Indiana University-Bloomington with a bachelor’s in journalism, Anicka joined TriMed’s Chicago team in 2017 covering cardiology. Close to her heart is long-form journalism, Pilot G-2 pens, dark chocolate and her dog Harper Lee.

Around the web

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Kate Hanneman, MD, explains why many vendors and hospitals want to lower radiology's impact on the environment. "Taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in healthcare isn’t just an opportunity," she said. "It’s also a responsibility."