Cardiologists push for new patient ID policies, citing multiple benefits

The Patient ID Now coalition has published a new framework urging government officials and private businesses to collaborate on making wide-ranging changes to patient identification policies in the United States. Dozens of industry groups and health systems, including the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association, are members of the coalition.

“The lack of a national strategy around patient identification and matching has limited the progress in the adoption of digital health information technologies and management,” the groups wrote. “It also threatens the continued advancement of digital health and virtual care. Meanwhile, the challenges and consequences from incorrectly identifying and matching patients to their health information are amplified by the ever-increasing exchange of health information across the healthcare system.”

Current patient identification policies cost the average healthcare facility approximately $17.4 million per year, the coalition wrote. In addition, they added, the lack of a unified policy has led to “several troubling privacy issues.”

The full document, “Framework for a National Strategy on Patient Identity,” can be read here. The ACC also explored the topic on its website, providing details on what its members can do to make an impact.  

Michael Walter
Michael Walter, Managing Editor

Michael has more than 18 years of experience as a professional writer and editor. He has written at length about cardiology, radiology, artificial intelligence and other key healthcare topics.

Around the web

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Kate Hanneman, MD, explains why many vendors and hospitals want to lower radiology's impact on the environment. "Taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in healthcare isn’t just an opportunity," she said. "It’s also a responsibility."