Benefits don't last when discontinuing warfarin after pulmonary embolism

If patients who experience pulmonary embolism take warfarin for two years, their risk of blood clots and major bleeding are significantly reduced. However, if they stop treatment, the benefits do not last, according to a French multicenter, randomized, double-blind study published this month in JAMA.

During the trial, all 371 patients received anticoagulation therapy for six months after having a symptomatic, unprovoked pulmonary embolism and being hospitalized at one of 14 French hospitals from July 13, 2007, to March 15, 2012. They were then randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive warfarin or placebo for 18 months. When they stopped treatment, they were followed for a median of 23.4 months. 

During the randomized phase, 3.3 percent of patients in the warfarin group and 13.5 percent of patients in the placebo group had the primary outcome of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or nonfatal or fatal major bleeding. The difference was statistically significant, and warfarin use was associated with a 78 percent relative risk reduction.

However, across the full study period including the treatment phase and the follow-up period after patients stopped treatment, the primary outcome occurred in 20.8 percent of patients in the warfarin group and 24.0 percent of patients in the placebo group. The researchers said the rates of recurrent VTE, major bleeding and unrelated deaths were similar between the groups. They added that the risk of major bleeding was low in both groups.

For the placebo group, the risk of recurrence was highest in the six months after they stopped taking warfarin. When patients who had received warfarin during the randomized phase stopped treatment, the rate of recurrent VTE was twice as high as those who had received placebo all along.

“Our results suggest that patients such as those who participated in our study require long-term secondary prophylaxis measures,” wrote lead author Francis Couturaud, MD, PhD, of Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Brest, and colleagues. “Whether these should include systematic treatment with vitamin K antagonists, new anticoagulants or aspirin, or be tailored according to patient risk factors (including elevated D-dimer levels) needs further investigation.”

Tim Casey,

Executive Editor

Tim Casey joined TriMed Media Group in 2015 as Executive Editor. For the previous four years, he worked as an editor and writer for HMP Communications, primarily focused on covering managed care issues and reporting from medical and health care conferences. He was also a staff reporter at the Sacramento Bee for more than four years covering professional, college and high school sports. He earned his undergraduate degree in psychology from the University of Notre Dame and his MBA degree from Georgetown University.

Around the web

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Kate Hanneman, MD, explains why many vendors and hospitals want to lower radiology's impact on the environment. "Taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in healthcare isn’t just an opportunity," she said. "It’s also a responsibility."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup