Expert panel recommends coronary CTA as first choice when evaluating for stable CAD

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) should be the first test clinicians use to evaluate stable coronary artery disease (CAD), according to a group of specialists assembled by the American College of Cardiology (ACC).  

The ACC Summit on Technology Advances in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography held a roundtable event in September 2019 to discuss this topic. The group’s report has been published in full in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

The report’s authors noted that recent evidence—including studies in both the United States and the United Kingdom—suggests a coronary CTA-first strategy can improve outcomes and “does not result in more cardiac catheterizations and revascularization.”

Getting more specialists to commit to a coronary CTA-first strategy may prove difficult at first, the authors explained, because SPECT myocardial perfusing imaging is currently much much more common.

“Transition to ‘coronary CTA first’ requires revising training programs in coronary CTA and advanced technologies to cover both coronary artery stenosis and atherosclerotic plaque, strong leadership from industry experts, and expanded certification of imaging skills to ensure consistent performance, the group wrote. “Capital investment will be critical. A national registry to monitor scan quality and medical and financial outcomes is advised.”

The ACC Summit Team also shared nine specific recommendations related to coronary CTA:

1. Begin with coronary CTA when evaluating patients with stable chest pain and “low-to-intermediate pre-test probability of obstructive CAD.” When patients have a high pre-test probability, staring with coronary CTA can also help rule out the presence of left main CAD, “particularly when a conservative treatment strategy is selected.”

2. Move cardiac CT services to the Ambulatory Payment Classification group and increase the overall payment for coronary CTA exams.

3. Consider bundled payment options for cardiac testing.

4. Investigate ways to increase the number of coronary CTA providers available to the public.

5. Update training guidelines for cardiovascular fellows, technologists and other staff members to improve overall provider competency when it comes to coronary CTA exams.

6. Begin work on a coronary CTA registry for the evaluation of chest pain.

7. Work with CMS, Congress and other applicable bodies to improve coronary CTA advocacy.

8. Engage and educate commercial providers about the importance of these exams, potentially convincing them to end required pre-approvals for coronary CTA exams.

9. Educate cardiologists and primary care physicians so that hey gain a better understanding of when—and when not—to consider coronary CTA.

Read the full report here.

A recent observational study in the Journal of the American Heart Association warned about overutilizing coronary CTA. Read more about that analysis here.

 

Related Cardiac CT Content:

VIDEO: Cardiac CT now recommended as a front line chest pain assessment tool — Interview with Leslee Shaw, PhD

VIDEO: Office-based cardiac CT and FFR-CT offer a new business model

‘A watershed moment’: HeartFlow praises new chest pain guidelines

Imaging group says new guidelines for chest pain contain some ‘troubling recommendations’

American Society of Nuclear Cardiology says AHA/ACC chest pain guidelines miss the mark

Expert panel recommends coronary CTA as first choice when evaluating for stable CAD

Michael Walter
Michael Walter, Managing Editor

Michael has more than 18 years of experience as a professional writer and editor. He has written at length about cardiology, radiology, artificial intelligence and other key healthcare topics.

Around the web

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Kate Hanneman, MD, explains why many vendors and hospitals want to lower radiology's impact on the environment. "Taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in healthcare isn’t just an opportunity," she said. "It’s also a responsibility."