High vs. low oxygen levels during heart surgery: Is one strategy safer than the other?

Both high and low concentrations of oxygen can be safely administered to heart patients during cardiac surgery, according to a new analysis published in JAMA Surgery.[1] The two treatment strategies appear to have the same impact on kidney health.

“Ischemia reperfusion and oxidative injury are major contributors to postoperative organ injury, and oxygen is integral to these molecular processes,” wrote first author Marcos Lopez, MD, MS, associate professor with Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), and colleagues. “It is unclear, however, if increasing oxygen tension during surgery by the administration of oxygen in excess of that required to saturate hemoglobin (hyperoxia) attenuates or exacerbates perioperative organ injury. Hyperoxia increases oxygen content in tissues, may decrease regional hypoxia, and might limit poor clinical outcomes associated with perioperative ischemia. Conversely, hyperoxia may increase reactive oxygen species production, may exacerbate reperfusion injury and has been associated with postoperative organ injury.”

To learn more, Lopez et al. tracked data from 200 adult patients who underwent an elective cardiac surgery at the same high-volume medical center from 2016 to 2020. Patients were ineligible if pregnant, on using supplemental oxygen at home or presenting with carotid stenosis greater than 50% or a recent history of acute coronary syndrome. While hyperoxia was used for 100 patients, the other 100 were treated with normal blood oxygen levels (normoxia).

Overall, the group found that oxygen levels did not appear to impact the risk of kidney injury among heart patients. In fact, acute kidney injury occurred in the exact same number of patients—21—in both groups.

In addition, rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, reintubation and death did not appear to be impacted by the patient’s oxygen levels.

“The study was designed to examine oxygen administration at the high and low ends of the spectrum to maximize the likelihood of seeing an oxygen treatment effect,” Lopez said in a statement. “We achieved oxygen treatment goals with meticulous protocol adherence, but saw no significant differences in organ injury.”

“This study broadens the acceptability of various oxygen administration strategies during cardiac surgery,” added corresponding author Frederic Billings IV, MD, MSc, a VUMC professor.

Click here to read the full study in JAMA Surgery.

Find more cardiac surgery content

Michael Walter
Michael Walter, Managing Editor

Michael has more than 18 years of experience as a professional writer and editor. He has written at length about cardiology, radiology, artificial intelligence and other key healthcare topics.

Around the web

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Kate Hanneman, MD, explains why many vendors and hospitals want to lower radiology's impact on the environment. "Taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in healthcare isn’t just an opportunity," she said. "It’s also a responsibility."