Epicardial ablation in Brugada syndrome reduces sudden cardiac death

A late-breaking study found epicardial ablation in Brugada syndrome (BrS) helped significantly reduce sudden cardiac arrest in these patients, increasing their survival. The results of the Epicardial Ablation in Brugada Syndrome to Prevent Sudden Death trial was presented at Heart Rhythm 2022, the annual meeting of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS).

There have been earlier studies that deified arrhythmogenic substrate in the myocardium in Brugada syndromes that appears to be the cause of the arrhythmia that trigger sudden cardiac death. While this has been treated using implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), there is still a high number of Brugada patients who die. 

The study, started in 2017, was designed to show catheter ablation is a safe procedure available for BrS patients at risk of sudden death.

"The discovery of the ‘Brugada substrate’ opens avenues enabling further therapeutic strategies," explained Giuseppe Ciconte, MD, PhD, Department of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milano, Italy, who presented the data. "Epicardial electrical abnormalities represent the hallmark phenotype signature of the disease. Arrhythmogenic substrate ablation successfully reduced the VT/VF burden, preventing recurrent ICD therapies."

A primary outcome of the study was freedom of ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT/VF) recurrences that cause sudden cardiac arrest. There ablation. Group saw  freedom from VT/VF at 95% at 36 months, versus 67% in the ICD group.

Illustration presented in this trial showing the location of ablations of the so-called "Brugada Substrate."
Illustration presented at HRS for this trial showing the location of ablations of the so-called "Brugada Substrate."

The aim of this study was to develop evidence-based treatment with optimal benefit for patients with BrS in terms of VT/VF burden reduction. Patients in the trial are randomized to epicardial catheter ablation of the arrhythmogenic substrate and ICD therapy (ablation arm) vs ICD therapy alone (control arm). 

There were 150 patients enrolled and randomized to receive ablation or not in a 2:1 fashion (ablation plus ICD 105 patients vs. ICD only arm with 45 patients). All patients were then clinically followed up every 6 months for the ICD only group and after 1, 3 and 6 months, then every 6 months for the ablation and ICD group.

Ciconte showed a case of one patient where there was an abolition of abnormal potentials after RF and no further VF episodes after ablation.

Links to all the Heart Rhythm 2022 late-breaking studies

Find more electrophysiology news

Dave Fornell is a digital editor with Cardiovascular Business and Radiology Business magazines. He has been covering healthcare for more than 16 years.

Dave Fornell has covered healthcare for more than 17 years, with a focus in cardiology and radiology. Fornell is a 5-time winner of a Jesse H. Neal Award, the most prestigious editorial honors in the field of specialized journalism. The wins included best technical content, best use of social media and best COVID-19 coverage. Fornell was also a three-time Neal finalist for best range of work by a single author. He produces more than 100 editorial videos each year, most of them interviews with key opinion leaders in medicine. He also writes technical articles, covers key trends, conducts video hospital site visits, and is very involved with social media. E-mail: dfornell@innovatehealthcare.com

Around the web

Several key trends were evident at the Radiological Society of North America 2024 meeting, including new CT and MR technology and evolving adoption of artificial intelligence.

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.