‘More dangerous than useful’: 1 in 5 coronary stents implanted by cardiologists are unnecessary, wasting $800M per year

Patients receive unnecessary coronary stents during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures at an alarming rate, according to a new report from the Lown Institute.

The analysis included approximately 1 million stent procedures performed at more than 1,700 U.S. hospitals and outpatient facilities from 2019 to 2021. Stents were deemed unnecessary if the patient was diagnosed with ischemic heart disease at least six months prior to undergoing PCI and they did not visit an emergency department or present with unstable angina or myocardial infarction within two weeks of the procedure.

Overall, the authors determined that heart patients received 229,000 low-value coronary stents during the three years of the study. That translates to 22% of the total number of stents implanted during that time, or approximately one every seven seconds.

The Lown Institute estimated that these low-value stents wasted up to $2.44 billion, or $813 million per year. The report also listed several significant side effects associated with PCI, including perforation, dissection, stent embolization, stent thrombosis, bleeding events and kidney damage.

“When physicians continue a practice despite the evidence against it, it becomes more dangerous than useful.” cardiologist Vikas Saini, MD, president of the Lown Institute, said in statement. “The overuse of stents is incredibly wasteful and puts hundreds of thousands of patients in harm’s way.”

The report included an in-depth look at which hospitals performed the most—and the fewest—unnecessary PCI procedures. Northwest Texas Hospital in Amarillo, Texas (52.6%), and Riverview Regional Medical Center in Gadsden, Alabama (50%), had the two highest overuse rates, Magnolia Regional Health Center in Corinth, Mississippi (1.24%) and Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center (1.58%) had the two lowest.

“The frequency at which stents are overused shows that many physicians are struggling to keep up with the evidence,” Saini said. “To be socially responsible, hospitals need to take a more active role in reducing these unnecessary procedures.”

Michael Walter
Michael Walter, Managing Editor

Michael has more than 18 years of experience as a professional writer and editor. He has written at length about cardiology, radiology, artificial intelligence and other key healthcare topics.

Around the web

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Kate Hanneman, MD, explains why many vendors and hospitals want to lower radiology's impact on the environment. "Taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in healthcare isn’t just an opportunity," she said. "It’s also a responsibility."