Women in cardiology receive less money from CMS, submit fewer charges

Women cardiologists receive lower payments from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) than men in both the inpatient and outpatient settings, according to new data published in JAMA Cardiology. They also appear to submit fewer charges to CMS, the study's authors explained. 

Using a 2016 CMS database, researchers analyzed reimbursement data to cardiologists, charges submitted and unique billing codes. The outcomes included median CMS payments received and median charges submitted in the inpatient and outpatient settings.  

The analysis included a total of 20,273 cardiologists who received CMS payments in 2016. A total of 17,524 of those cardiologists received CMS payments in the inpatient setting, and just 13% of those cardiologists were women. 

Also, 16,929 cardiologists received CMS payments in the outpatient setting. Again, just 13% were women.

The authors found that men received higher median CMS payments in the inpatient ($62,897 vs. $45 ,288) and outpatient ($91,053 vs. $51,975) settings compared to women.

In addition, the median number of charges sent by men were higher in both the inpatient (1,190 vs. 959) and outpatient (1,685 vs. 870) settings.

The team offered several potential reasons for these differences. 

“Perhaps most importantly, the difference in payments appears to be due to a difference in coding patterns or clinical practices and not a CMS reimbursement gender bias,” wrote lead author Inbar Raber, MD, of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at Harvard Medical School, and colleagues. “Our findings suggest that women are submitting fewer charges compared with men. Accordingly, this will affect the total value of CMS payments to men and women. The lower number of charges submitted by women may reflect different practice styles between men and women.”

Raber et al. noted that it could also reflect differences in the volume of patients seen and/or differences in assigned service responsibilities.

“A 2020 study found that female primary care physicians generated less revenue owing to a lower number of patient visits but spent more time with direct patient contact than their male counterparts,” the authors wrote.

Additional research is still needed to identify gender differences in reimbursement and to understand why potential gender-associated differences in payment exist, the authors concluded. 

Read the full study here.

Cardiology Related Medicare Payments Content:

Cardiologists join fight for better MIPS transparency

Medicare spending on cardiology, interventional cardiology declined $906M in 2020

Cardiologists support legislation that would limit costly Medicare cuts

Congress reaches bipartisan deal to blunt Medicare cuts, drawing praise from radiology advocates

Cardiologists oppose 2 key CMS proposals, warn of ‘unintended consequences’

CMS finalizes 2022 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule — payments to cardiologists take a hit

Cardiologists urge CMS to reconsider MPFS changes that could ‘jeopardize the delivery of care’

Cardiologists, other healthcare providers speak out against ‘detrimental’ cuts included in MPFS final rule

Find more cardiology revenue stories

Around the web

Several key trends were evident at the Radiological Society of North America 2024 meeting, including new CT and MR technology and evolving adoption of artificial intelligence.

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.