Few consumers use healthcare price and quality data

Fewer than 10 percent of people used price and quality comparison data when choosing doctors, hospitals or health insurance plans in the past 12 months, according to the Kaiser Health Tracking poll released on April 21.

The telephone survey was conducted from April 8 to April 14 and included a sample of 1,506 adults living in the U.S.

Of the respondents, 21 percent said they had seen information comparing quality among health insurance plans, 17 percent said they had seen information comparing quality among hospitals and 16 percent said they had seen information comparing quality among doctors. However, only 6 percent, 4 percent and 6 percent of respondents, respectively, used that information.

When asked if they had seen price comparison data, 27 percent said they had seen it for health insurance plans, 8 percent had seen it for hospitals and 9 percent had seen it for doctors. However, only 9 percent, 2 percent and 3 percent of respondents, respectively, used that information.

Further, 64 percent of respondents said it was difficult to find out how much medical treatments and procedures cost. Still, 68 percent said they were confident they could afford their medical costs and 55 percent said they were confident they could afford a major illness such as a heart attack, cancer or serious injury that required hospitalization.

When asked how they would pay for a $500 unexpected medical bill, 45 percent said they could pay the bill in full, 20 percent said they would use a credit card to pay for the bill and pay off the balance over time, 7 percent said they would need to borrow the money and 20 percent said they would not be able to afford the bill.

Tim Casey,

Executive Editor

Tim Casey joined TriMed Media Group in 2015 as Executive Editor. For the previous four years, he worked as an editor and writer for HMP Communications, primarily focused on covering managed care issues and reporting from medical and health care conferences. He was also a staff reporter at the Sacramento Bee for more than four years covering professional, college and high school sports. He earned his undergraduate degree in psychology from the University of Notre Dame and his MBA degree from Georgetown University.

Around the web

Ron Blankstein, MD, professor of radiology, Harvard Medical School, explains the use of artificial intelligence to detect heart disease in non-cardiac CT exams.

Eleven medical societies have signed on to a consensus statement aimed at standardizing imaging for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Kate Hanneman, MD, explains why many vendors and hospitals want to lower radiology's impact on the environment. "Taking steps to reduce the carbon footprint in healthcare isn’t just an opportunity," she said. "It’s also a responsibility."