Skip to main content
  • Clinical
      |Clinical
    • Acute Coronary Syndromes
    • Cardiac Surgery
    • Covid-19
    • Heart Failure
    • Heart Health
    • Heart Rhythm
    • Hypertension
    • Interventional Cardiology
    • Mitral Valve
    • Pharmaceutics
    • Structural Heart Disease
    • TAVR
    • Tricuspid Valve
    • Vascular & Endovascular
  • Management
      |Management
    • Chest Pain Guidelines
    • Compensation
    • Economics
    • Education & Training
    • Legal News
    • Patient Care
    • Policy & Regulations
    • Professional Associations
    • Quality
    • Revenue
    • Staffing
  • Technology
      |Technology
    • AI
    • Cardiac Imaging
    • Cath Lab
    • CT
    • CVIS
    • ECG
    • Echo
    • EP Lab
    • Informatics
    • MRI
    • Nuclear Cardiology
    • Remote Monitoring
  • Videos
  • Conferences
      |Conferences
    • ACC
    • AHA
    • ASE
    • ASNC
    • ESC
    • EuroPCR
    • HFSA
    • HRS
    • SCAI
    • SCCT
    • SIIM
    • SNMMI
    • STS
    • TCT
    • VIVA
  • Custom Content
      |Custom Content
    • Experience Stories
    • Webinars & Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Forty Under 40 Award
      |Forty Under 40 Award
    • Class of 2026
    • Class of 2025

Search form

Home

News You Need to Know Today
News Alert: FDA highlights safety issue with leadless pacemakers
Thursday, November 18, 2021
Link to Twitter Link to Facebook Link to Linkedin Link to Vimeo

News Alert

FDA highlights safety issue with leadless pacemakers, focusing on Medtronic’s Micra

All pacemakers are associated with a risk of cardiac perforation, the agency said, but perforation-related complications appear to be more severe with leadless pacing systems.

READ MORE >
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin

FDA highlights safety issue with leadless pacemakers, focusing on Medtronic’s Micra

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin
All pacemakers are associated with a risk of cardiac perforation, the agency said, but perforation-related complications appear to be more severe with leadless pacing systems.
READ MORE >

Innovate Healthcare thanks our partners for supporting our newsletters.
Sponsorship has no influence on editorial content.

Interested in reaching our audiences, contact our team

*|LIST:ADDRESSLINE|*

You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from Innovate Healthcare.
Change your preferences or unsubscribe here

Contact Us  |  Unsubscribe from all  |  Privacy Policy

© Innovate Healthcare, a TriMed Media brand
Innovate Healthcare

Recent Newsletters

STS late-breaker looks at 2 CABG approaches | Key sex differences in 35-year long study | PSVT nasal spray hits US market
New-look device implanted for first time in US | IVL vs. atherectomy | How cardiologists can help with noncardiac surgeries
Week in Review: Abbott exec plans exit | IVL competition heats up | ASNC favors PET | Medtech companies speak out | AI for POCUS
Faster treatments, better outcomes | Robotic heart surgery gains momentum | Cath lab strategies | TAVR's next challenge
Tap water linked to potential risks | New cardiac care certification announced | FDA clears AI software | Post-stroke injections
ASNC chooses PET | Comparing OBLs & ASCs | TMVR device gains approval | The risks of HF | Paradoxical low-flow, low gradient AS
Key takeaways from new stroke guideline | The fight over certification | AI for POCUS | A PET trend to watch | Abbott VP to exit

Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page …28
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Page 31
    • Current page 32
    • Page 33
    • Page 34
    • Page 35
    • Page 36 …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
  • Home
  • News
  • Article Archive
  • Custom Content
  • Webinars
  • Press Releases
  • Content Studio
  • Advertising
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cardiovascular Business
  • HealthExec
  • Radiology Business
 
© 2026 Innovate Healthcare | All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
 
Design by Adaptive Theme