Skip to main content
  • Clinical
      |Clinical
    • Acute Coronary Syndromes
    • Cardiac Surgery
    • Covid-19
    • Heart Failure
    • Heart Health
    • Heart Rhythm
    • Hypertension
    • Interventional Cardiology
    • Mitral Valve
    • Pharmaceutics
    • Structural Heart Disease
    • TAVR
    • Tricuspid Valve
    • Vascular & Endovascular
  • Management
      |Management
    • Chest Pain Guidelines
    • Compensation
    • Economics
    • Education & Training
    • Legal News
    • Patient Care
    • Policy & Regulations
    • Professional Associations
    • Quality
    • Revenue
    • Staffing
  • Technology
      |Technology
    • AI
    • Cardiac Imaging
    • Cath Lab
    • CT
    • CVIS
    • ECG
    • Echo
    • EP Lab
    • Informatics
    • MRI
    • Nuclear Cardiology
    • Remote Monitoring
  • Videos
  • Conferences
      |Conferences
    • ACC
    • AHA
    • ASE
    • ASNC
    • ESC
    • EuroPCR
    • HFSA
    • HRS
    • SCAI
    • SCCT
    • SIIM
    • SNMMI
    • STS
    • TCT
    • VIVA
  • Custom Content
      |Custom Content
    • Experience Stories
    • Webinars & Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Forty Under 40 Award
      |Forty Under 40 Award
    • Class of 2026
    • Class of 2025

Search form

Home

News You Need to Know Today
News Alert: FDA highlights safety issue with leadless pacemakers
Thursday, November 18, 2021
Link to Twitter Link to Facebook Link to Linkedin Link to Vimeo

News Alert

FDA highlights safety issue with leadless pacemakers, focusing on Medtronic’s Micra

All pacemakers are associated with a risk of cardiac perforation, the agency said, but perforation-related complications appear to be more severe with leadless pacing systems.

READ MORE >
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin

FDA highlights safety issue with leadless pacemakers, focusing on Medtronic’s Micra

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin
All pacemakers are associated with a risk of cardiac perforation, the agency said, but perforation-related complications appear to be more severe with leadless pacing systems.
READ MORE >

Innovate Healthcare thanks our partners for supporting our newsletters.
Sponsorship has no influence on editorial content.

Interested in reaching our audiences, contact our team

*|LIST:ADDRESSLINE|*

You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from Innovate Healthcare.
Change your preferences or unsubscribe here

Contact Us  |  Unsubscribe from all  |  Privacy Policy

© Innovate Healthcare, a TriMed Media brand
Innovate Healthcare

Recent Newsletters

Cardiologists earning more than ever | New medical device tariffs? | Trump's $100K visa fee | SCAI calls out reimbursement model
FDA approves oral semaglutide for reducing cardiovascular risks | PET & carotid plaque | AFib after CABG | Nonobstructive HCM
Week in Review: J&J devices recalled over cybersecurity risk | Pacemaker issues | Compensation hits new high | Labeling updates
More than 1M pacemakers recalled | A safety warning from Abbott | Q&A: What cardiologists know and don’t know about PFA
PFA for VT shows promise | Predicting & preventing heart attacks | FDA clears AI-powered software | SGLT2 inhibitors & TAVR
Cardiologist compensation hits all-time high | PET is transforming patient care | Robotic PFA | Performing PCI & TAVR together
ICE-guided structural heart interventions | Medtronic's new 3-in-1 stent | TTVR after a heart transplant | Shock-related deaths

Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page …48
    • Page 49
    • Page 50
    • Page 51
    • Current page 52
    • Page 53
    • Page 54
    • Page 55
    • Page 56 …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
  • Home
  • News
  • Article Archive
  • Custom Content
  • Webinars
  • Press Releases
  • Content Studio
  • Advertising
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cardiovascular Business
  • HealthExec
  • Radiology Business
 
© 2026 Innovate Healthcare | All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
 
Design by Adaptive Theme