Skip to main content
  • Clinical
      |Clinical
    • Acute Coronary Syndromes
    • Cardiac Surgery
    • Covid-19
    • Heart Failure
    • Heart Health
    • Heart Rhythm
    • Hypertension
    • Interventional Cardiology
    • Mitral Valve
    • Pharmaceutics
    • Structural Heart Disease
    • TAVR
    • Tricuspid Valve
    • Vascular & Endovascular
  • Management
      |Management
    • Chest Pain Guidelines
    • Compensation
    • Economics
    • Education & Training
    • Legal News
    • Patient Care
    • Policy & Regulations
    • Professional Associations
    • Quality
    • Revenue
    • Staffing
  • Technology
      |Technology
    • AI
    • Cardiac Imaging
    • Cath Lab
    • CT
    • CVIS
    • ECG
    • Echo
    • EP Lab
    • Informatics
    • MRI
    • Nuclear Cardiology
    • Remote Monitoring
  • Videos
  • Conferences
      |Conferences
    • ACC
    • AHA
    • ASE
    • ASNC
    • ESC
    • EuroPCR
    • HFSA
    • HRS
    • SCAI
    • SCCT
    • SIIM
    • SNMMI
    • STS
    • TCT
    • VIVA
  • Custom Content
      |Custom Content
    • Experience Stories
    • Webinars & Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Forty Under 40 Award
      |Forty Under 40 Award
    • Class of 2026
    • Class of 2025

Search form

Home

News You Need to Know Today
News Alert: FDA highlights safety issue with leadless pacemakers
Thursday, November 18, 2021
Link to Twitter Link to Facebook Link to Linkedin Link to Vimeo

News Alert

FDA highlights safety issue with leadless pacemakers, focusing on Medtronic’s Micra

All pacemakers are associated with a risk of cardiac perforation, the agency said, but perforation-related complications appear to be more severe with leadless pacing systems.

READ MORE >
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin

FDA highlights safety issue with leadless pacemakers, focusing on Medtronic’s Micra

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin
All pacemakers are associated with a risk of cardiac perforation, the agency said, but perforation-related complications appear to be more severe with leadless pacing systems.
READ MORE >

Innovate Healthcare thanks our partners for supporting our newsletters.
Sponsorship has no influence on editorial content.

Interested in reaching our audiences, contact our team

*|LIST:ADDRESSLINE|*

You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from Innovate Healthcare.
Change your preferences or unsubscribe here

Contact Us  |  Unsubscribe from all  |  Privacy Policy

© Innovate Healthcare, a TriMed Media brand
Innovate Healthcare

Recent Newsletters

How CCTA could make ICA a thing of the past | Positron makes a move | New LAAO guidelines: 6 key takeaways
PFA linked to risk of phrenic nerve damage | Cardiology practices must be more sustainable | Positron finds a new home
Week in Review: A safety risk with Medtronic catheters | New hypertension guidelines | Be prepared for cath lab complications
How the economy is reshaping cardiac care | Heartflow raises $364M, rings Nasdaq opening bell | Cardiologist pay stays steady
FDA clears CCTA AI plaque assessment | Former surgeon general joins Eko | Boston Scientific launches stents vs. DCB trial
FTC challenge to Edwards JenaValve acquisition may delay FDA clearance | Cardiology tops FDA breakthough devices | Mo99 supply
How to prepare for cath lab complications | Progress for a new PAH drug | TAVR & BAV stenosis | PDA closure in premature infants

Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page …59
    • Page 60
    • Page 61
    • Page 62
    • Current page 63
    • Page 64
    • Page 65
    • Page 66
    • Page 67 …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
  • Home
  • News
  • Article Archive
  • Custom Content
  • Webinars
  • Press Releases
  • Content Studio
  • Advertising
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cardiovascular Business
  • HealthExec
  • Radiology Business
 
© 2026 Innovate Healthcare | All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
 
Design by Adaptive Theme