Skip to main content
  • Clinical
      |Clinical
    • Acute Coronary Syndromes
    • Cardiac Surgery
    • Covid-19
    • Heart Failure
    • Heart Health
    • Heart Rhythm
    • Hypertension
    • Interventional Cardiology
    • Mitral Valve
    • Pharmaceutics
    • Structural Heart Disease
    • TAVR
    • Tricuspid Valve
    • Vascular & Endovascular
  • Management
      |Management
    • Chest Pain Guidelines
    • Compensation
    • Economics
    • Education & Training
    • Legal News
    • Patient Care
    • Policy & Regulations
    • Professional Associations
    • Quality
    • Revenue
    • Staffing
  • Technology
      |Technology
    • AI
    • Cardiac Imaging
    • Cath Lab
    • CT
    • CVIS
    • ECG
    • Echo
    • EP Lab
    • Informatics
    • MRI
    • Nuclear Cardiology
    • Remote Monitoring
  • Videos
  • Conferences
      |Conferences
    • ACC
    • AHA
    • ASE
    • ASNC
    • ESC
    • EuroPCR
    • HFSA
    • HRS
    • SCAI
    • SCCT
    • SIIM
    • SNMMI
    • STS
    • TCT
    • VIVA
  • Custom Content
      |Custom Content
    • Experience Stories
    • Webinars & Videos
  • Subscribe
  • Forty Under 40 Award
      |Forty Under 40 Award
    • Class of 2026
    • Class of 2025

Search form

Home

News You Need to Know Today
News Alert: FDA highlights safety issue with leadless pacemakers
Thursday, November 18, 2021
Link to Twitter Link to Facebook Link to Linkedin Link to Vimeo

News Alert

FDA highlights safety issue with leadless pacemakers, focusing on Medtronic’s Micra

All pacemakers are associated with a risk of cardiac perforation, the agency said, but perforation-related complications appear to be more severe with leadless pacing systems.

READ MORE >
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin

FDA highlights safety issue with leadless pacemakers, focusing on Medtronic’s Micra

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin
All pacemakers are associated with a risk of cardiac perforation, the agency said, but perforation-related complications appear to be more severe with leadless pacing systems.
READ MORE >

Innovate Healthcare thanks our partners for supporting our newsletters.
Sponsorship has no influence on editorial content.

Interested in reaching our audiences, contact our team

*|LIST:ADDRESSLINE|*

You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from Innovate Healthcare.
Change your preferences or unsubscribe here

Contact Us  |  Unsubscribe from all  |  Privacy Policy

© Innovate Healthcare, a TriMed Media brand
Innovate Healthcare

Recent Newsletters

Patient's family sues health system for negligence | Cardiologist accused of abuse | Woman says husband was misdiagnosed
Boston Scientific pulls plug on TAVR devices | Trends in cardiac surgery | Marijuana bad for blood vessels | Cuffless BP tech
Employment models keep evolving | J&J MedTech ordered to pay $147M | Boston Scientific pulls plug on TAVR devices
Breaking News: Boston Scientific pulls plug on TAVR devices
Wait times to see a cardiologist keep increasing | FDA approves Abbott's TMVR device | PPMI after mitral valve surgery
TTVR tech used for first time | SCAI wants lead-free cath labs | A big day for Medtronic DCB | Meril TAVR valves after 1 year
Jury orders J&J MedTech to pay $147M | Cooling device terminates AFib | The risks of cannabis use | PFA linked to heart damage

Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page …77
    • Page 78
    • Page 79
    • Page 80
    • Current page 81
    • Page 82
    • Page 83
    • Page 84
    • Page 85 …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
  • Home
  • News
  • Article Archive
  • Custom Content
  • Webinars
  • Press Releases
  • Content Studio
  • Advertising
  • Submit Press Release
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cardiovascular Business
  • HealthExec
  • Radiology Business
 
© 2026 Innovate Healthcare | All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
 
Design by Adaptive Theme