Heart attack patients treated at for-profit hospitals more likely to be readmitted

For-profit hospitals in the United States may be starting to fall behind their nonprofit counterparts when it comes to heart attack outcomes, according to new data published in JACC: Advances.[1] Readmission rates—a recognized sign of care quality—seem to be falling at nonprofit hospitals while they remain mostly unchanged at for-profit facilities.

The study’s authors reviewed data from more than 4.6 million acute myocardial infarction (AMI) hospital admissions from 2013 to 2022. All data came from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Nationwide Readmissions Database. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI diagnosis codes were used to identify AMI hospitalizations. 

Overall, the AMI readmission rate at for-profit hospitals remained relatively stable from 2013 (13%) to 2022 (12.7%). At nonprofit hospitals, on the other hand, the AMI readmission rate dropped from 11.5% in 2013 to 10.5% in 2022. This same pattern was true when only looking at patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. For patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), meanwhile, both for-profit and nonprofit hospitals saw readmission rates decline over the course of the study.

The authors also found that for-profit and nonprofit hospitals were linked to comparable in-hospital mortality rates. One area where for-profit hospitals bested nonprofit hospitals was reducing cardiac complications. Respiratory and renal complications, on the other hand, were more common at for-profit hospitals than they were at nonprofit hospitals.

Subscribe to Cardiovascular Business News

In addition, for-profit hospitals were linked to lower healthcare costs, a higher risk of nonhome discharge and slightly longer hospitalizations.

“Discharge planning and early outpatient follow-up warrant particular attention at for-profit facilities,” wrote corresponding author Peyman Benharash, MD, a surgeon with UCLA Health, and colleagues. The group added that additional research is needed to learn more about how standardized protocols could help clinicians deliver more consistent reductions in AMI readmissions over time.

Click here to read the full study in JACC: Advances, an American College of Cardiology journal.

Michael Walter
Michael Walter, Managing Editor

Michael has more than 19 years of experience as a professional writer and editor. He has written at length about cardiology, radiology, artificial intelligence and other key healthcare topics.

Subscribe to Cardiovascular Business News

Subscribe to Cardiovascular Business News